Avis important aux grands voyageurs cactophiles (cf2) (3 réponses)   
Bonjour !

Toujours à la recherche de taxons impossibles à trouver sous forme de graines, je fais appel à tous les voyageurs cactophiles qui iraient visiter quelque pays d'Amérique que ce soit, y compris les USA ou le Canada.

Pour Taxonomie des Cactaceae "Description des espèces" vol.3 et 4, j'ai besoin de compléter la galerie des photos des graines au microscope numérique. Il reste encore environ 600 taxons à trouver (j'en ai déjà 2000...).

[attachment 115240 ArmatocereuscartwrightianusRE.jpg]
[attachment 115241 LeuenbergeriaguamachoVenDRRMSD151.jpg]

Je serais heureux de trouver des volontaires pour me rapporter quelques graines des espèces manquantes, notamment des Opuntioidées, que l'on ignore généralement au niveau graines, surtout le genre Opuntia et Cylindropuntia, et d'une manière générale, toutes les graines manquantes sur la liste actualisée que vous pouvez consulter et imprimer.

[www.cactus-aventures.com]

Comme cette liste concerne tous les taxons, si vous désirez une liste des taxons manquants du pays que vous allez visiter, je peux vous en envoyer une via mon e-mail (joel@cactus-aventures.com)

Vos conditions seront les miennes (je ne paye pas le voyage ! ;-) ), j'offre à tous les contributeurs, les droits sur toutes les photos qui seront obtenues des graines, et ils seront dûment cités dans les ouvrages.

De votre côté, pour chaque taxon, il sera nécessaire d'avoir la localisation et une photo, car les identifications ne seront pas toujours possibles sur le terrain et il peut y avoir confusion.

Je sais que c'est un travail de titan, bien pire que celui des deux premiers volumes, mais je souhaite cet ouvrage le plus complet possible ! Et on est près d'y parvenir !

Les graines peuvent aussi provenir de collections si elles sont bien identifiées ou avec photos des plantes et des fruits si possible.
Le facteur temps est avec nous, la publication ne devrait pas intervenir avant 2021 ! :-/

Merci aux 50 personnes qui travaillent déjà sur ce projet de collectes de graines : je viens de recevoir de la part de "forumeurs" une offre de graines de Cleistocactus candelilla ssp piraymirensis, Selenicereus vagans et de Micranthocereus violaciflorus : les petits ruisseaux font les grandes rivières ! Merci à Fred et à Philippe !

D'avance, merci !
          Rilevazione vini 30 06 2017.xls   
none
          Rilevazione petroliferi 15 06 2017.xls   
none
          《全国地市县财政统计资料2016》.xls   
【作者(必填)】 【文题(必填)】《全国地市县财政统计资料2016》.xls.xls 【年份(必填)】 【全文链接或数据库名称(选填)】http://www.taodocs.com/p-49631475.html 谢谢大家了
          Новая глобальная атака шифровальщика: подробности от «Доктор Веб»   

28 июня 2017 года

Специалисты компании "Доктор Веб" изучают новый троянец-шифровальщик Trojan.Encoder.12544, упоминаемый в СМИ как Petya, Petya.A, ExPetya и WannaCry-2. На основании предварительного анализа вредоносной программы компания "Доктор Веб" представляет рекомендации, как избежать заражения, рассказывает, что делать, если заражение уже произошло, и раскрывает технические подробности атаки.

Наделавший много шума червь-шифровальщик Trojan.Encoder.12544 представляет серьезную опасность для персональных компьютеров, работающих под управлением Microsoft Windows. Различные источники называют его модификацией троянца, известного под именем Petya (Trojan.Ransom.369), но Trojan.Encoder.12544 имеет с ним лишь некоторое сходство. Эта вредоносная программа проникла в информационные системы целого ряда госструктур, банков и коммерческих организаций, а также заразила ПК пользователей в нескольких странах.

На текущий момент известно, что троянец заражает компьютеры при помощи того же набора уязвимостей, которые ранее использовались злоумышленниками для внедрения на компьютеры жертв троянца WannaCry. Массовое распространение Trojan.Encoder.12544 началось в первой половине дня 27.06.2017. При запуске на атакуемом компьютере троянец несколькими способами ищет доступные в локальной сети ПК, после чего по списку полученных IP-адресов начинает сканировать порты 445 и 139. Обнаружив в сети машины, на которых открыты эти порты, Trojan.Encoder.12544 пытается инфицировать их с использованием широко известной уязвимости в протоколе SMB (MS17-10).

В своем теле троянец содержит 4 сжатых ресурса, 2 из которых являются 32- и 64-разрядной версиями утилиты Mimikatz, предназначенной для перехвата паролей открытых сессий в Windows. В зависимости от разрядности ОС он распаковывает соответствующую версию утилиты, сохраняет ее во временную папку, после чего запускает. При помощи утилиты Mimikatz, а также двумя другими способами Trojan.Encoder.12544 получает список локальных и доменных пользователей, авторизованных на зараженном компьютере. Затем он ищет доступные на запись сетевые папки, пытается открыть их с использованием полученных учетных данных и сохранить там свою копию. Чтобы инфицировать компьютеры, к которым ему удалось получить доступ, Trojan.Encoder.12544 использует утилиту для управления удаленным компьютером PsExec (она также хранится в ресурсах троянца) или стандартную консольную утилиту для вызова объектов Wmic.exe.

Контроль своего повторного запуска энкодер осуществляет с помощью файла, сохраняемого им в папке C:\Windows\. Этот файл имеет имя, соответствующее имени троянца без расширения. Поскольку распространяемый злоумышленниками в настоящий момент образец червя имеет имя perfc.dat, то файл, предотвращающий его повторный запуск, будет иметь имя C:\Windows\perfc. Однако стоит злоумышленникам изменить исходное имя троянца, и создание в папке C:\Windows\ файла с именем perfc без расширения (как советуют некоторые антивирусные компании), уже не спасет компьютер от заражения. Кроме того, троянец осуществляет проверку наличия файла, только если у него достаточно для этого привилегий в операционной системе.

После старта троянец настраивает для себя привилегии, загружает собственную копию в память и передает ей управление. Затем энкодер перезаписывает собственный файл на диске мусорными данными и удаляет его. В первую очередь Trojan.Encoder.12544 портит VBR (Volume Boot Record, загрузочная запись раздела) диска C:, первый сектор диска заполняется мусорными данными. Затем шифровальщик копирует оригинальную загрузочную запись Windows в другой участок диска, предварительно зашифровав ее с использованием алгоритма XOR, а вместо нее записывает свою. Далее он создает задание на перезагрузку компьютера, и начинает шифровать все обнаруженные на локальных физических дисках файлы с расширениями .3ds, .7z, .accdb, .ai, .asp, .aspx, .avhd, .back, .bak, .c, .cfg, .conf, .cpp, .cs, .ctl, .dbf, .disk, .djvu, .doc, .docx, .dwg, .eml, .fdb, .gz, .h, .hdd, .kdbx, .mail, .mdb, .msg, .nrg, .ora, .ost, .ova, .ovf, .pdf, .php, .pmf, .ppt, .pptx, .pst, .pvi, .py, .pyc, .rar, .rtf, .sln, .sql, .tar, .vbox, .vbs, .vcb, .vdi, .vfd, .vmc, .vmdk, .vmsd, .vmx, .vsdx, .vsv, .work, .xls, .xlsx, .xvd, .zip.

Троянец шифрует файлы только на фиксированных дисках компьютера, данные на каждом диске шифруются в отдельном потоке. Шифрование осуществляется с использованием алгоритмов AES-128-CBC, для каждого диска создается собственный ключ (это — отличительная особенность троянца, не отмеченная другими исследователями). Этот ключ шифруется с использованием алгоритма RSA-2048 (другие исследователи сообщали, что используется 800-битный ключ) и сохраняется в корневую папку зашифрованного диска в файл с именем README.TXT. Зашифрованные файлы не получают дополнительного расширения.

После выполнения созданного ранее задания компьютер перезагружается, и управление передается троянской загрузочной записи. Она демонстрирует на экране зараженного компьютера текст, напоминающий сообщение стандартной утилиты для проверки дисков CHDISK.

screenshot Trojan.Encoder.12544 #drweb

В это время Trojan.Encoder.12544 шифрует MFT (Master File Table). Завершив шифрование, Trojan.Encoder.12544 демонстрирует на экране требование злоумышленников об уплате выкупа.

screenshot Trojan.Encoder.12544 #drweb

Если в момент запуска на экране появилось сообщение о запуске утилиты CHDISK, незамедлительно выключите питание ПК. Загрузочная запись в этом случае будет повреждена, но ее можно исправить при помощи утилиты восстановления Windows или Консоли восстановления, загрузившись с дистрибутивного диска. Восстановление загрузочной записи обычно возможно в ОС Windows версии 7 и более поздних, если на диске имеется используемый системой скрытый раздел с резервной копией критичных для работы Windows данных. В Windows XP такой способ восстановления загрузки не сработает. Также для этого можно использовать Dr.Web LiveDisk — создайте загрузочный диск или флешку, выполните загрузку с этого съемного устройства, запустите сканер Dr.Web, выполните проверку пострадавшего диска, выберите функцию «Обезвредить» для найденных угроз.

По сообщениям из различных источников единственный используемый распространителями Trojan.Encoder.12544 ящик электронной почты в настоящее время заблокирован, поэтому они в принципе не могут связаться со своими жертвами (чтобы, например, предложить расшифровку файлов).

С целью профилактики заражения троянцем Trojan.Encoder.12544 компания «Доктор Веб» рекомендует своевременно создавать резервные копии всех критичных данных на независимых носителях, а также использовать функцию «Защита от потери данных» Dr.Web Security Space. Кроме того, необходимо устанавливать все обновления безопасности операционной системы. Специалисты компании «Доктор Веб» продолжают исследование шифровальщика Trojan.Encoder.12544.

Инструкция пострадавшим от Trojan.Encoder.12544


          Comment on Office Online Server April 2017 release by andrew gemperline   
Looks like you need Visual Studio Enterprise or MSDN Platforms https://download.microsoft.com/download/1/5/4/15454442-CF17-47B9-A65D-DF84EF88511B/Products_by_Benefit_Level.xlsx
          Mühendislik Fakültesi, 2016-2017 Yaz Dönemi Ders Programı   
Mühendislik Fakültesi, 2016-2017 Yaz Dönemi Ders Programı (.xls) Mühendislik Fakültesi, 2016-2017 Yaz Dönemi Ders Programı (.pdf) ... daha fazla »
          Infinite memory plan in 4 bit   
Hello, Here is the plan that you think of this plan https://www.developpez.net/forums/attachments/p289913d1498677807/club-professionnels-informatique/taverne-club-humour-divers/humour-informatique/j-ai-cree-jeu-l-interieur-vie-programme-informatique/table-karnaugh-f-z-.xlsx/ thank you...
          Bettacare Warehouse Clearance Narrow Stair Gate 68.5-75.5cm (ext to 155cm)   

Warehouse Clearance - Box Maybe Slightly Damaged

Bettacare Narrow Auto Close Baby Safety Gate Narrow Width will fit the smaller doorway openings between 68.5cm & 75.5cm. There are several extensions also available for this Stair Safety gate to ensure the best fit. Cilppasafe/Bettacare (Narrow Width) Auto Close Stair Gate is Pressure Fitted and automatically closes and locks itself which eliminates the danger of the gate being left open. The gate will open either way.

Auto Close Narrow Child Safety Gate unit is secured to the door frame using advanced design locking handwheels which are childproof and cannot work loose during everyday use. It is also supplied with both self adhesive and screw-in wall cups to cover every installation option.

1-Click Extend This gate is extendable from 68.5 cm right up to 155 cm using add-on panels, and here at BabySecurity.co.uk it couldn't be easier to choose the right combination. Simply use the "Extend To" options above to select the width of your doorway or opening and we will choose the correct panels for you.

View the Gate chart for sizes >

  • Automatic closing and Auto locking Baby Safety Gate
  • Bettacare Safety Gate to fit most Narrow door sizes
  • Variety of easy fitting options all supplied with Stair Gate
  • Pressure mounted Stair Gate
  • Gate height is 75.5cm
  • Safety Gate extensions available from stock
  • Screw fittings will be required for wallpapered surfaces

Please double check all width requirements BEFORE ordering.

Extensions also available separately; see Related Products tab.

Please Note: The second image illustrates an extended gate

Regular Price: £35.99

£27.99


          Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2 Intel-La suite di lusso che non ti costa nulla   

OpenOffice.org è la più popolare suite office gratuita. Tra le novità introdotte dalla versione 3.0 spicca l'attesa compatibilità con i formati di Office 2007 e finalmente non è più necessario installare X11 per farla funzionare

Sono finiti i tempi in cui eri obbligato a pagare un prezzo proibitivo (o a procurarti una copia illegale) per avere una suite efficiente di programmi che ti permettesse di scrivere una lettera, creare una presentazione o utilizzare un foglio di calcolo. Adesso ci sono soluzioni totalmente gratuite, che non hanno nulla da invidiare a Microsoft Office. Tra queste, OpenOffice.org è probabilmente la migliore.

OpenOffice.org comprende Writer (processore testi), Calc (foglio di calcolo), Impress (presentazioni), Base (database), Math (formule matematiche) e Draw (grafiche vettoriali). La suite lavora con molti formati di documenti, è capace di modificare ed esportare file PDF, ed è pienamente compatibile con quelli più diffusi di Microsoft Office (tra cui .doc, .xls e .ppt).

Dalla versione 3.0, OpenOffice.org è finalmente un'applicazione con interfaccia Aqua e non è più necessario installare X11 per farla funzionare. Tra le altre novità spicca la capacità di aprire i file Open XML introdotti in Office 2007, tra cui .docx, .xlsx e .pptx. Per quanto riguarda l’interfaccia, le icone e alcuni dettagli sono stati rivisti, ma il design resta molto simile a quello della versione precedente e ci aspettavamo un'evoluzione maggiore da questo punto di vista.

Altre novità presenti dalla versione 3.0 di OpenOffice.org comprendono una finestra di avvio, chiamata Start Centre, per accedere alle diverse applicazioni e ai template, il supporto di 1024 colonne nei fogli di calcolo, una funzione migliorata per ritagliare le immagini in Draw e Impress, e la capacità di mostrare molteplici pagine di testo mentre si lavora in Writer.

Download Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2 Intel in Softonic


          A "Five Star" mystery: Saudi Arabia, Brexit, Trump and election fraud. Plus: The Comey "tape"   
This investigation in the Irish Times examines a very strange affair involving Northern Ireland and Saudi Arabia. The author of that piece, Fintan O'Toole, probably doesn't know that his research links up to a mystery which captured my attention some twelve years ago, when this humble blog focused on the possibility of fraud in the 2004 presidential election.

Before we get to the US connection, we must summarize the Irish Times story.

In recent days, you may have read about the far-right Democratic Unionist Party of Northern Ireland, because that's the group with which Theresa May must strike a deal if she wants to stay in power. (Her chances are starting to look bleak.) The DUP is pretty obnoxious, as this site makes clear: They are pro-creationism, anti-abortion, and very anti-gay.

The DUP is also also very, very pro-Brexit. In fact, they funded a pricey ad campaign in favor of Brexit. Strangely, those ads appeared in publications outside of Northern Ireland.

That campaign cost a lot of money, leading Fintan O'Toole to ask: Where did the DUP get the funds?

It turns out that the money came from a strange Scottish group called the Constitutional Research Council, headed by one Richard Cook. But that organization seems to have been a cut-out (as was the DUP itself).

The real funders were Saudis.
What they found is that Richard Cook has a history of involvement with a very senior and powerful member of the Saudi royal family, who also happens to have been a former director of the Saudi intelligence agency. In April 2013, Cook jointly founded a company called Five Star Investments with Prince Nawwaf bin Abdul Aziz al Saud. The prince, whose address is given as a royal palace in Jeddah, is listed on the company’s initial registration as the holder of 75 per cent of the shares.
Prince Nawwaf, who died in 2015, was no casual investor. He had been Saudi minister for finance, government spokesman and diplomatic fixer before becoming head of intelligence. His son, Mohammed bin Nawwaf, has, moreover, been the Saudi ambassador to both the UK and Ireland since 2005. When Five Star was set up in 2013, Prince Nawwaf was 80, had suffered a stroke and used a wheelchair. It seems rather remarkable that he was going into business with a very minor and obscure Scottish conservative activist.
"Five Star"...! That name rang a bell. Where had I heard it before? Suddenly, it all came back...

2004 and all that. Unless you've been reading this blog for a very long time, you may not know that I was once transfixed by the allegations of election fraud in the 2004 election. Like many others, I became convinced that electoral hugger-mugger occurred in Ohio.

In a series of posts published in late 2004 and early 2005, I looked into some rather bizarre claims concerning an entity called "Five Star Trust," which allegedly played a role in swinging the election to Dubya. The Trust, it was said, was funded by the Saudis, who (as most people know) had deep connections to Bush.

I'll soon give links to those old pieces on the Five Star Trust. First, a word of warning: My posts linked to the work of a writer named Wayne Madsen, toward whom I once had a very naive and trusting attitude. In 2004, his reputation was not so reeky as it later became; Madsen was a former NSA employee who had appeared on ABC's Nightline, Marketplace and 60 Minutes. Why shouldn't I quote a man with such an impressive resume?

Unfortunately, Madsen made increasingly wild accusations without bothering to cite evidence. Behind the scenes, Madsen proved to be an opaque and bizarre individual.

Fellow blogger Brad Friedman (who has led the fight against computerized voting) was also intrigued -- for a very brief period -- by Madsen's "Five Star" claims. Brad soon became so infuriated with the way Madsen did business that he decided never to say another good word about the man. Other semi-mainstream publications developed a similar "hands off" attitude.

For years, my standard line on Madsen was this: "He's right about half the time, and I'm never sure which half is which." After a while, even that assessment began to seem too generous.

In 2008, I wrote a series of posts which argued (based on public sources) that Barack Obama may have been on "Company" business during his mysterious 1981 trip to Pakistan. (Here, here and here.) Madsen pilfered my work without crediting me. He then sensationalized the evidence and jammed it into a rather terrible book called The Manufacturing of a President, 90 percent of which is paranoid flotsam and jetsam unrelated to the work's ostensible subject.

As you might imagine, I now have little reason to speak well of Wayne Madsen, whose claims have grown ever more inane: He says that Obama is both gay and Kenyan-born, and that Israel attacked the USS Cole. Naturally, he has found a home on Alex Jones's radio show. From ABC News to Infowars: A sad trajectory indeed.

(A sudden thought just hit me. Do you think that former NSA man Wayne Madsen could be one of Louise Mensch's "sources" within the intelligence community? Boy, that would explain a lot.)

Have I given enough caveats and apologies? I believe I have. Here, then, are the links to my previous "Five Star" posts dealing with the mysteries of the 2004 election. Start here, then go here, then go here. Although my posts quote Madsen, I also offer some original research.

From the first post (November 26, 2004):
Madsen goes on to say that money for the operations was funneled through a Saudi-linked financial entity based in Houston called Five Star Trust, which was also apparently used to fund both Bush and Bin Laden.

Other monies came from carefully-hidden Enron loot stashed away in the Cook Islands...
I've tried some preliminary Googling on Five Star Trust (which is also spelled "5 Star Trust"). One citation goes to a court case listed here, involving one Marion Horn, Jr., a.k.a. "J.R. Horn," a one-time Republican candidate in Kentucky later convicted of wire fraud. (Also see here and here.) From what I can tell, the guy received a ridiculously attentuated sentence -- 18 months -- for a serious crime (one commentator mentioned the figure of "$1B") committed while on parole for a similar offense.

Much of the above information came by way of the Diligizer Board, which seems to be a clearinghouse for information about shady operators in the financial world. On one page they take a brief look at an accused security fraudster named Howard E. Liner -- and just look at what pops up:
He claims to be directly involved with VP Chaney and running actually the FED program. Mr. Liner pretends to be a former JAG and Military attorney. They are connected to Noir Intertrade, who shall be the commitment holder! They also mentioned the 5-Star Trust, the worlds richest trust with TRILLIONS (sorry forgot to ask the currency!!) on the account in Credit Suisse and UBS.
Hmm. Did he just say trillions? It that's true, the allegation of Saudi involvement may well have substance.
By the time I wrote my final post in this series (January 4, 2005), I had already become disenchanted with Madsen. He connected the Five Star Trust to a DC-based Christian cult called The Fellowship, the subject of a famous book by Jeffrey Sharlet. The "Fellowship" angle has no discernible evidence to back it.

That said, I can't help but wonder what happened to Marion Horn. His 2004 connection to the Five Star Trust parallels, in some ways, the later linkage between Scotland's Richard Cook and the current incarnation of Five Star.

While traipsing through my earlier pieces, I stumbled across this 2005 post, which quotes some work done by Daniel Hopsicker on a firm called Triad, which was run by Saudi arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi (whose recent death I should have noted in these pages.) The following quotation from the Hopsicker story may seem to take us far from the Five Star mystery, but bear with me: I promise to bring us back on course.
Was Adnan Khashoggi a principal in a company which has been counting the votes of American servicemen overseas? Answer: highly likely.

Both Election.com, and Triad, the election company cited for causing most of the problems in Ohio, should receive close scrutiny for evidence of Khashoggi involvement.

While there has been no suggestion of it anywhere in the media, the name "Triad" was used extensively by Khashoggi at exactly the same time (the early 80's) and in exactly the same place (Palm Beach, Florida) as the "Triad Governmental Systems" involved in Ohio's current election "difficulties."
There's much of else of interest in that 2005 piece. For current purposes, let's focus on the following:
Election.com should be examined for the invisible hand of the Saudi financier and CIA “fixer.”

News reports stated Election.com was owned by an offshore Saudi front company in Bermuda consisting of five unnamed Saudi billionaires, until scrutiny forced a sale to Accenture, the remnants of the disgraced and disbanded Arthur Anderson, the accounting firm which made Enron possible.
Five unnamed Saudi billionaires...?

Could that be the origin of the "Five Star" nomenclature? I can't prove it, but the idea makes a lot of sense.

The obvious questions: Why would five Saudi billionaires surreptitiously involve themselves with the 2004 American election (and perhaps earlier elections)? Why would the same Saudi interests care about promoting Brexit in 2016? What's in it for them?

The Prince. The Irish Times story quoted above connects the current "Five Star Investments" to Prince Nawwaf bin Abdul Aziz al Saud, the former head of Saudi intelligence. That name has appeared in these pages before. From a post published on August 26, 2016:
Now let's turn to a little-noticed piece titled "Wealthy Muslims helped Donald Trump build his empire":
Saudi princes: Prince Mutaib bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, a former minister in the Saudi government, and member of the Saudi royal family, reportedly lives in a floor-through Trump Tower apartment. Other former Trump property tenants include Prince Nawaf bin Sultan bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud, a Saudi royal family member who owned a 10,500 sq. foot (975 sq. meter) condo at the Heritage at Trump Place that went on sale this year for $48.5 million.
Trump has long had strong connections to Saudi Arabia. Most people forget that the Saudis were the ones who bailed out Donald Trump when he nearly went under.
Saudi billionaire Prince Al-Waleed Bin Talal said he twice saved US presidential candidate Donald Trump from bankruptcy, describing him as a “bad and ungrateful person”.

In an interview with Turkey’s Hurriyet newspaper, the prince said he bought Trump’s hotels after they were acquired by the banks which demanded he repay his debts.

The yacht he used to come to Antalya, southwest of Turkey, is one he bought from Trump when he was threatened with bankruptcy.
That yacht, by the way, is the one made famous by previous owner Adnan Khashoggi, and by the movie Never Say Never Again.

Now let's visit this New Yorker piece for more on the Trump/bin Talal relationship:
This latest tweet battle with Trump refers to the Prince’s investments in troubled Trump properties. The first of these transactions took place in 1991, when, according to Businessweek, bin Talal bought Trump’s huge yacht the Trump Princess from creditors, for eighteen million dollars. At the time, Trump’s Atlantic City casinos were heavily indebted; he also put his airline, the Trump Shuttle, up for sale.

The second deal came in 1995, when bin Talal and a partner, a Singapore hotels company, paid hundreds of millions of dollars to take control of The Plaza, on Fifth Avenue, from Trump. A Times story at the time said that the buyers had agreed to “pay part, or all, of Mr. Trump’s $300 million mortgage on the hotel, guarantee interest payments on Mr. Trump’s Plaza debt and spend $28 million to renovate part of the hotel.” Trump, the article said, was “under heavy pressure because of more than $115 million of guarantees he has given on the Trump Organization’s debt, and because of his recently announced attempt to raise $250 million to expand his casino investments.”
The prince is not just any Saudi oligarch: He was the finance minister of that nation and is rumored to represent other Saudi business interests. He is the second biggest investor in Fox News.
Interestingly, Saudi princes were investing in Trump at the same time they were (allegedly) throwing money at a fellow named Osama Bin Laden. Why were the Saudis dealing with a guy like Trump? And why did they treat him as a demi-deity during his recent visit to Saudi Arabia?

Here's the final paragraph from my 2016 post:
Yes, Saudis have donated to the Clinton Foundation -- but the Foundation is a charity, from which the Clintons derive no profit. Trump's hotels in Jeddah are serious business. Talk about a conflict of interest! Most Americans are not even aware that Trump has substantial investments in Saudi Arabia. You know damned well that if the Clintons had made such investments, our news media would remind you of that fact every single day.
Congress and the mainstream media have spent a great deal of time and effort trying to uncover Trump's strange relationship with Putin's Russia -- and properly so. On June 16, 2016, this humble blog was the first online publication to outline a "Putin-Trump" theory.

But Russia is not the full story. We also have to look at Saudi Arabia. Evidence suggests that Saudis have meddled in Brexit. Moreover, evidence suggests a consortium of five Saudi billionaires have played a very covert role in certain American elections -- and they may even have started as early as the 1980s. Strangest of all, they came to the rescue of Donald J. Trump in the 1990s. Why? You got me!

You can't dismiss this post as a "conspiracy theory," for one simple reason: I don't pretend to have anything like a proper theory. At this stage, I'm just trying to formulate the right questions.

Elsewhere: In previous posts, I have sided with those who argue that Trump probably does have "tapes" of his conversations with James Comey. My argument is based on a photo of Trump in the Oval Office with a digital voice recorder on his desk, and on the fact that Trump has been known to record surreptitiously his business meetings. Besides, NSA head Mike Rogers is clearly in Trump's corner, and the NSA scoops up everything.

However, Trump biographer Tim O'Brien says that Trump has falsely claimed to record conversations...
“He’s said this over the years to reporters when they go into the Trump organization, ‘I just want to let you know that I’m taping you right now,'” O’Brien noted. “And he said it multiple times during my interviews with him. He said that into my own tape recorder when I recorded our interviews.”

“But when he sat down for the deposition, my attorney said, ‘Mr. Trump, do you have a taping system?'” he recalled. “And he said no. And [my attorney] said, ‘Why did you say this to Mr. O’Brien.’ And he essentially said, ‘I wanted to intimidate him.'”
Perhaps. But one should also keep in mind that Trump may have been in a state in which it is illegal to tape someone without his permission.
          Решение № 370 от 29.06.2017   
О внесении изменений в Решение Совета народных депутатов Березовского городского округа от 22.12.2016 № 329 «О бюджете Березовского городского округа на 2017 год и на плановый период 2018 и 2019 годов»
Скачать:R.-370-ot-29.06.2017izm.-v-byudzhet.doc [1,5 Mb] (cкачиваний: 3)
Prilozhenie-1-dohody-2017-2019-izmenenie-iyun.xls [200,5 Kb] (cкачиваний: 3)
Poyasnitelnaya-zapiska-iyun-2017.doc [82,5 Kb] (cкачиваний: 2)
          JSP에서 다른 파일형식으로 저장하기   
JSP 파일에서 excel로 출력하는 예를 들어 설명해보자... 먼저 jsp에서 html 시작하기 전에 다음 코드를 적용하여 response를 set한다. <% response.setHeader("Content-Type", "application/vnd.ms-excel"); response.setHeader("Content-Disposition", "attachment; filename=파일이름.xls" ); response.setHeader("Co..
          Turns Out College Football Championship Didn't Bring $300 Million to Tampa   
The City of Tampa may have a highlight reel to show off its successful 2017 College Football Playoff championship, but Hillsborough County doesn't seem to have the tax receipts to prove the event was an economic success for the region.

Initial data, just released from the Florida Department of Revenue, show no spike in taxes collected in Hillsborough County from sales in January 2017, when it hosted the national championship and a number of large events surrounding the game. The data will be reviewed and adjusted by the state next month.

While many factors play into a county's tax collections on any given month, Hillsborough saw just a 6% gain in tax receipts from the same month in 2016, on-par with the state's 6% growth from the same time period. Hillsborough's gain was also consistent with previous year's reports, where the county posted 4-6% gains most months compared to the same periods in 2015.

Pinellas and Pasco counties also posted similar tax numbers in January 2017 compared to their 2016 trends, each up 4% from 2016's reports. Polk County saw the bay area's best January 2017, reporting 12% better sales than from the previous January.

VIDEO: Why you should never believe an economic impact study

When Tampa landed playoff championship week more than three years ago, Hillsborough Commissioner Ken Hagan claimed the event would bring somewhere between 1,700 and 1,800 full-time jobs, as well as $250 million to $350 million in economic impact.

However, that kind of revenue would have generated an extra $17.5 million to $24.5 million in sales taxes, which there seems to be little evidence to support.

While it is difficult to determine all of the factors for taxable sales countywide, supporters of the national championship game point to large crowds gathering at Tampa-area hotels and establishments the week leading up to the game as proof the event is good for the economy. But economists are quick to point to tax data, which often refutes the robust claims of major events.

Rob Higgins, Executive Director of the Tampa Bay Sports Commission, told 10News the numbers from local hotels and Tampa International Airport were extraordinary. But overall, Hillsborough collected $127 million in taxes from January 2017 sales, compared to $120 million in January 2016.






FOLLOW: Shadow of the Stadium on Twitter
FOLLOW: Shadow of the Stadium on Facebook


          Interim Fix for Maximo Asset Management 7.5.0.11 Build 007 now available   

The Interim Fix for Maximo Asset Management 7.5.0.11 Build 007 is now available.
IF007 (TPAE_75011_IFIX.20170615-1103.psi.zip) is cumulative of all prior Interim Fixes for Maximo Asset Management 7.5.0.11.
Here is the location to download this interim fix:
http://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/swg/quickorder?parent=ibm%2FTivoli&product=ibm/Tivoli/IBM+Maximo+Asset+Management&release=All&platform=All&function=fixId&fixids=7.5.0.11-TIV-MBS-IFIX007&includeSupersedes=0&source=fc

 

 

ListofAPARs.xlsxView Details


          Interim Fix for Maximo Asset Management 7.6.0.7 Build 003 now available   

The Interim Fix for Maximo Asset Management 7.6.0.7 Build 003 is now available.
IF003 (TPAE_7607_IFIX.20170622-1025.im.zip) is cumulative of all prior Interim Fixes for Maximo Asset Management 7.6.0.7.
Here is the location to download this interim fix:
http://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/swg/quickorder?parent=ibm%7ETivoli&product=ibm/Tivoli/IBM+Maximo+Asset+Management&release=7.6.0.7&platform=All&function=fixId&fixids=7.6.0.7-TIV-MBS-IFIX003&includeSupersedes=0&source=fc

 

 

ListofAPARS.xlsxView Details


          Creating a Marketing Plan   

The role of your marketing plan is to help determine the strategies and tactics you will employ to help you meet your overall business goals by expanding your business and connecting with customers. Some of the standard components we recommend you include in every marketing plan are:

  • Situation Analysis: Normally this will include a market analysis, a SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats), and a competitive analysis. The market analysis will include segmentation, customer information, and market needs analysis.
  • Marketing Strategy: This should include objectives, and focused strategy including target market and value proposition.
  • Goals & Objectives: Specific goals on leads and opportunities generated or sales influenced by product or geography.
  • Budget & Execution Plan: Include enough detail to track expenses accurately and follow up on a plan vs. actual analysis. Include specific tactics and mediums you will employ, at what times, to target your market. It is helpful to include a calendar of events.

Effective marketing is not just about quantity of activity, it is about quality, planning and consistency. Position yourself for success by taking it one-step at a time. To help you prioritize and get the most out of your investment of time and budget, we have developed tools to help you get started.  If you are not sure where to start, or have never completed a marketing plan, use the Pre-Marketing Plan Brainstorm Guide and the Marketing Plan Schedule Template, which enables you to plan your budget, ensure you are reaching the right customers and prospects and helps to drive a steady flow of leads to your sales pipeline.

Finally, your marketing plan should be measured by the results that it produces. To measure success, you need to set marketing goals by first defining what you wish to achieve in quantifiable terms. A good place to start is by calculating the realistic number of marketing touches, enquiries and qualified sales leads that are required to meet your sales revenue objectives. To assist with this process, we recommend completing the Marketing Leads Calculator. Partners may leverage this template to plan their marketing campaigns, estimate ROI and track the performance of those campaigns throughout the year.

The key to driving results is to actually implement your plan; consistently and on time. Ensure that your plan is practical, achievable, and that the goals are measurable. We highly recommend you analyze your plan versus actual performance at the end of each fiscal year.

If you need help creating your marketing plan, we recommend contacting a Marketing Services Bureau (MSB) or Partner Development Center (PDC).  For additional help developing a strong marketing strategy and all of the foundational elements needed to drive successful lead generation, we recommend the Partner Marketing & Lead Generation Toolkit, a step-by-step guide on how to plan, invest, execute and measure more effective marketing.


          Wiki Page: Batch process subdirectories in main directory   
(Please visit the site to view this file) Load all .dgn files in Directory and subdirectories for batch processing How to create the list of files 1. Open Windows Command Prompt 2. Navigate to the main directory where desired files are stored 3. Use the “dir /s/b *.dgn >dgnlist.txt” command to create a text file of all .dgn files under the current directory. It is recommended to create the text file to a specified location using a full path. 4. Open the created txt file either in notepad or excel and copy the contents into Column B in the TemplateForBatch.xlsx worksheet 5. Use the auto fill feature to fill column A, C, and D. 6. Select Column A and copy the contents into the first empty cell in column A 7. In the first empty cell in column C enter “[MODEL=:AllModels:]” and use the autofill function. 8. Use the autofill on Column E. 9. Select all contents in the sheet and use the sort tool to sort all information based on Column A by Value from Smallest to Largest 10. Select all contents of Column E and copy the contents into the BatchTemplate.bprc file, when done save the BatchTemplate.bprc as a new file and name appropriately. 11. In MicroStation Launch the Batch Process utility open the desired .bprc and create or load an existing command file to run. 12. Run the batch process.(Please visit the site to view this video)
          Is your online activity secure? WikiLeaks doesn’t think so   
Documents published by WikiLeaks on June 15 show that the CIA has been monitoring the flow of internet traffic using some hacking tools as part of Company operations on some of the home and business Wi-Fi routers made by Netgear, Linksys, D-Link, Belkin, Asus and other top tech firms and wireless devices like such as wireless (802.11) routers and access points (APs).

Included in the "dozens of files" released by WikiLeaks are installation guides, manuals, and maps that indicate the CIA's use of various tools for monitoring and analyzing their targets' online activities, among other things. The infected routers spy on the internet-connected devices' activities without the user knowing, turning them into "covert listening points. The only thing is that everything you’re doing on the internet is going through the CIA.

The CIA created software implants capable of gaining control in roughly 25 different devices from 10 manufacturers. You need to check if your home Wi-Fi router is one of them.
CIA has a 10-year-old, 175-page user manual for setting up the spying activity dubbed "Cherry Blossom” which “maintains an information database of wireless network devices in the “WiFi Devices.xls” document. This database contains information about hundreds of network devices, including manufacturer, make, model, version, reference design, FCC ID, network processor, wireless chipset, operating system, default username/password, etc. It also contains firmware analysis information about exact make, model, hardware versions, and firmware versions supported by CB,” read the WikiLeaks report.

CherryBlossom monitor a target's internet activity, scan for contact information, redirect their browser, and otherwise rummage around. It also helps injecting malicious firmware into the targeted routers and when successful, it becomes nearly impossible to detect them because such malware infect the hardware itself and is not something anti-virus software is capable of checking.

The CIA also hacked networked passwords.

The document also consists of a list of routers and access points, some of which are more than five years old. The first list of devices, titled “WiFi Devices,” is described in the CherryBlossom user manual. Now, while it’s clear that the CherryBlossom project targeted the mentioned list of routers, however, it still remains unclear if they have actually been successfully compromised.

Routers have been a frequent and desirable target for freelance or intelligence community hackers because they offer access to an entire network, and have historically come equipped with various security flaws.

It also explains how a maneuver called "tomato'' can steal the routers' passwords if a default feature known as a universal plug and play is left on.

          Aphid Bulletin 27 (29 September to 5 October)    
50KB
2014

             
Overzicht nieuwbouw van Nederlandse zeeschepen in de Bouwlijst

In aanbouw per 1 juli 2017

Samenstelling door René Cornel

1 augustus 2015 in aanbouw te Hoogezand

ARKLOW VALE
Bouwjaar 2015, imonummer 9772527, grt 2999
Eigenaar Avoca Shipping B.V., Rotterdam
Manager Arklow Shipping Nederland B.V., Rotterdam
Gebouwd Royal Bodewes, Hoogezand / 721
LxBxH 86.93 x 15.00 x 7.17 meter
Vermogen 2365 pk, snelheid 12.5 knoop, roepsein PCZV

© Riemer van Bolhuis


          Error de la aplicación Web de Excel   
Hola, Tengo un problema al abrir el archivo .xlsx en Excel debido a este error: Error de la aplicación Web de Excel "Se ha producido un error. Por favor, inténtelo de nuevo. " Cualquier consejo será apreciado enormemente.
          一般社団法人が法務局に印鑑登録(代表理事…   

一般社団法人が法務局に印鑑登録(代表理事の印鑑)をする際、登録する事ができる印鑑の大きさについては法務省令により定められています。

(質問文にある様に一辺が1cm以上3cm以下の正方形に入る大きさ)

 

根拠となる法令は「一般社団法人等登記規則(平成二十年八月一日法務省令第四十八号)」と「商業登記規則(昭和三十九年三月十一日法務省令第二十三号)」です。

一般社団法人等登記規則(平成二十年八月一日法務省令第四十八号)

(商業登記規則の準用)

第三条  商業登記規則(昭和三十九年法務省令第二十三号)第二条から第六条まで、第九条第一項(第一号から第三号までを除く。)、第三項、第四項、第五項(第二号から第五号までを除く。)、第六項、第七項及び第十項、第九条の二、第九条の三、第九条の四(第一項後段を除く。)、第九条の五(第四項を除く。)、第九条の六から第十一条まで、第十三条から第十八条まで、第十九条(第一項第四号を除く。)、第二十条から第二十二条まで、第二十七条から第四十五条まで、第四十八条から第五十条まで、第五十三条第一項、第六十一条第一項から第四項まで、第六十二条から第六十五条まで、第六十六条第一項、第六十七条第一項及び第二項、第六十八条、第七十一条、第七十二条(第一項第二号、第三号及び第五号を除く。)、第七十三条、第七十四条、第七十七条、第八十条(第一項第六号を除く。)、第八十一条、第八十五条第二項、第九十八条から第百四条まで、第百五条(第一項第三号及び第四号を除く。)、第百六条(第四項を除く。)、第百七条から第百九条まで、第百十一条、第百十二条、第百十四条、第百十五条、第百十七条並びに第百十八条の規定は、一般社団法人等の登記について準用する。 (以下略)

商業登記規則(昭和三十九年三月十一日法務省令第二十三号)

第九条  印鑑の提出は、当該印鑑を明らかにした書面をもつてしなければならない。この場合においては、次の各号に掲げる印鑑を提出する者は、その書面にそれぞれ当該各号に定める事項(以下「印鑑届出事項」という。)のほか、氏名、住所、年月日及び登記所の表示を記載し、押印しなければならない。

3  印鑑の大きさは、辺の長さが一センチメートルの正方形に収まるもの又は辺の長さが三センチメートルの正方形に収まらないものであつてはならない。

なお、一般社団法人の代表理事の印鑑を、法務局に登記する際に提出する「印鑑届書」にも登記できる印鑑の大きさについての記載がありますので、ご確認下さい。

 

商業・法人登記簿謄本,登記事項証明書(代表者事項証明書を含む),印鑑証明書の交付等の申請(法務省)

印鑑に関する届出

申請書様式 PDF Excel

記載例 PDF

 

内枠に「代表理事之印」と刻印するのですか。「代表理事」だけではだめということでしょうか。

 

こちらの回答については、下記のサイトに記載があります。

印鑑うんちく事典【ハンコヤドットコム】

角印には「・・・印」「・・・之印」はいれるのか

基本的に、入れる必要はありません。

会社の角印などで「印」「之印」などが入っていますが

これは、文字の配置の問題でレイアウトのバランスをとるために入れているのです。


          行くぜ東北 女川町復幸祭2016応援ツアー 華夕美 高政見学 明神丸まかない丼 女川湾周遊1   

おはようございます。管理栄養士の一之瀬隆哉です。

熱海銀座 寿し忠 起雲閣(きうんかく)へようこそ 鳥佳 (炭火焼鳥 鳥佳)のページ

釜鶴ひもの店/熱海の老舗 こだわり干物を自社製造 販売 通販

Scott | 熱海 レストランスコット

熱海でおすすめの洋菓子店|三木製菓

女川観光旅行 女川歴史民俗紀行


映画「ケアニン~あなたでよかった~」公式サイト


大田区産業プラザ 2017大会(7月14日(金)第5回研究発表会・通常総会・15日(土)シンポジウム)

檑亭 千年屋 J:COMオンデマンド 視聴サイト デジブック ケアネット アマゾン じゃらん 

うなぎ亭 友栄 箱根湯寮  Yahoo Japan  熱海金城館 富士屋ホテル 湯本富士屋ホテル

宮城県女川町のホテル・エルファロ=女川トレーラーハウス宿泊村= 移転リニューアル準備中

【公式】東伊豆ダイニング 東伊豆今宵【最低価格保証】 厳選いい宿 - テレビで見た宿をお得に予約|テレビ東京 

KKRホテル熱海【公式サイト】 | 海を一望できる熱海のリゾートホテル

伊豆高原 旨い酒と料理の宿 森のしずく -神の雫ワインや美味しい料理が味わえるグルメ旅- プチホテル/ペンション

登録銘菓ホール・イン

伊東マリンタウン | 伊豆の「道の駅伊東マリンタウン」 ホーム | 丘の上の一軒家レストラン「澤亭」

ビデオカメラ GZ-E770 Web ユーザーガイド| JVCケンウッド SHOPPING PLAZA HAYAMA STATION(葉山ステーション)

レストラン「潮幸」 | 葉山ホテル音羽ノ森【公式】 YOKOHAMA MARINE TOWER | 横浜マリンタワー

『オペラ座の怪人』横浜公演スペシャルサイト|劇団四季 HAWAIʻI EXPO 2017

茅ヶ崎の日帰り天然温泉 竜泉寺の湯 湘南茅ヶ崎店|軟水の高濃度炭酸泉と最新の岩盤浴

栄養経営士テキスト 日清MCTオイル&パウダー エネプリン もっとエネルギー 社会福祉法人 同胞互助会

ヘルシーネットワーク 関西電力病院 社会医療法人近森会

茅ヶ崎の日帰り天然温泉 竜泉寺の湯 湘南茅ヶ崎店|軟水の高濃度炭酸泉と最新の岩盤浴

茅ヶ崎の自然食とEM商品、自然食ダイニングの「にじまる」 京城苑 日本災害食学会研究発表会

省力化と豊かさ実現! スチコンレシピ集&活用術 WA・ON (株)WA・ONは、あなたのくらしに“ちょっとプラス”を考える会社です。

食べ歩きブログ 今日もどこかで  冬のごほうび 防災士 女川町復幸祭2017

トーヨーフーズ株式会社|ドライパック缶(ひじき・大豆・コーン等) 

非常食のサバイバルフーズ。賞味期限25年の長期保存できる防災備蓄食料品 | 株式会社セイエンタプライズ

LLFの長期賞味期限食品(防災備蓄食・携行食・カロリーバランス食)|ロングライフフーズ

防災・非常食UAA食品®|アルファフーズ株式会社

高齢者の口腔と摂食嚥下の機能維持・向上のための取組に関する調査

横浜市の焼肉ビーフマン横浜関内店 UCワールドおみやげサービス アロハプログラム | ハワイ州観光局公認の公式ラーニングサイト

日本災害食学会

女川温泉 華夕美  味の館 金華楼 Beerbar ガル屋 焼肉 幸楽 理容ヨコヤマ 酒飯処 かぐら おんま~と 

ジャパネットたかた ネスレ 臨床栄養 WEBセミナー EL FARO - エルファロ - 被災地初のトレーラーハウス宿泊村 

明神丸 
みなとまちセラミカ工房
 シーパル観光案内所 女川温泉ゆぽっぽ 女川湾周遊・金華山航行潮プランニング 

ハワイ州観光局公式Facebook 地元市場ハマテラス シェラトン・ワイキキ / Sheraton Waikiki ハワイ州観光局 - Hawaii ハワイ – gohawaii.com 

明太子(めんたいこ)の通販・お取り寄せ|博多の味
 銘菓「蹴洞(けほぎ)」 onagawa factory(小さな復興プロジェクト)   たびレジ - 外務省海外旅行登録

クラフトビールの横濱金沢ブリュワリー・MR配達弁当のデリバリーLaFusion菜na
 えらべる倶楽部 よーじや 病態栄養学会 えきねっと(JR東日本)

栄養学に基づいた食事を提案する街の健康バランス食堂|「鹿屋アスリート食堂(アスショク)」
KKRホテル東京(国家公務員共済組合連合会 東京共済会館) メール 日本栄養士会 神奈川県栄養士会

もしもごはん 本気で取り組む災害食 個人備蓄のすすめと共助・公助のあり方 いしかわ百万石物語・江戸本店 石川県アンテナショップ
緊急時に備えた家庭用食料品備蓄ガイド
  おながわさんま収獲祭2016 日本酒通販Sake芯

みんなで減災 スフィア・プロジェクト 避難所運営ガイドライン 災害時のトイレの必要数計算シート
防災科学技術研究所  生きる力を育む防災教育の展開 物流センサス 受援力のススメ

全国栄養経営士のつどい ホテルビスタ仙台 博多 由布院・武雄温泉 万葉の湯 女川町復幸祭2017 東日本大震災メモリアル 南浜つなぐ館

博多 由布院・武雄温泉 万葉の湯 Kobe Japanese Steak House | Hawaii Honolulu Waikiki 肉ソン大統領(新横浜/鉄板焼き) 神戸ステーキハウス

産直鮮魚とマグロの明神丸

 産直鮮魚とマグロの明神丸 
ジャンル:宮城県女川町公認居酒屋 
アクセス:地下鉄門前仲町駅 2番出口 徒歩5分 住所:〒135-0047 東京都江東区富岡1‐24‐6 2F(地図
利用しています→ベストスタイル グルテストNeoアルファ パインファイバー
食べながら備えるローリングストックBOX ホリカフーズ 災害食・非常食
ブログ型ダイエット日記サイト『ダイエット☆マメグラフ』
Dining&BARU 藍の音
ジャンル:居酒屋 
アクセス:京急本線横須賀中央駅 徒歩4分 住所:〒238-0007 神奈川県横須賀市若松町3-4-1 202(地図

宮城まるごと探訪 - 宮城県の観光,イベント情報はこちら
 おらほのラジオ体操
女川町観光協会ホームページ

ぶらり♪お散歩カメラ|写真を「撮る」「見る」「伝える」。感動を共有するコミュニティサイト。


南三陸 2014南三陸温泉旅行 蒲鉾本舗 高政
[南三陸 de お買い物]ギフト 海鮮 海産物 珍味 スイーツの通販 取寄せ

南三陸 復興ストア - Yahoo!ショッピング
 鎌倉戦隊ボウサイダー
横浜南部市場の東北再生支援ショップ「愛と勇気とさんま」 水曜・日曜定休 営業時間 : 10時~18時 横浜市中区元浜町4-36 安協サービスセンター1F
東北ココロむすぶプロジェクトin鎌倉『東北物産展』
 3月12,,26日(土) 鎌倉生涯学習センターにて開催
南三陸復興ダコの会「オクトパス君」オフィシャルページ
 お取り扱い店
卒 煙 式 sotsuen.jpn.org
 卒煙式で、ただひたすらガマンする禁煙ではなく、本当の"卒煙"を達成してください。
復刻版 宮城県郷土かるた

多言語情報翻訳システム 地震災害
 NHK生活・防災
Cafe & Dinner PUKA
食べログ Cafe & Dinner PUKA フェイスブック
食べ歩きブログ 今日もどこかで 

おながわファンクラブ
 開いたお店の商品を買って応援
がんばる女川セット(水産加工品セット) 商品詰合せセット 2 種類 A セット:3,000円/箱 ・ B セット:5,000円/箱 (税込・送料別)
たかや(@takayaichi) - Twilog←最新の食べ歩きや地元の画像をつぶやいています
FBログ Ichinose Takaya←Facebook上で『全体に公開』でつぶやいた投稿 デジブック 『女川グッズ』


平成28年3月25日25日夕から女川町復幸祭2016応援ツアーに参加しました。
横浜からのバスツアー、翌朝は竜泉寺の湯 仙台泉店で入浴休憩。
石巻の海岸沿いを通り一年ぶりの女川駅に到着。
津波伝承「復幸男」見学後のさんまつみれ汁は冷めたからだにしみわたりました。
ビールとサンマ焼き、女川塩レモンハイボール飲んだ後、理容ヨコヤマで散髪。睡眠不足と酔いで散髪中はうたた寝。
散髪後、コーヒーでも飲んでいきなよとあたたかい一言。 メン棒で耳の仲もきれいにしてくれるんですね。
その後、昨年坂の上のお店の前まで行って入らなかった.味の館 金華楼へ。
26日夕食は幸楽で焼き肉、Sugar Shackでお酒、酒飯処 かぐらで目指しと刺し盛りを食べたあと華夕美で一泊。
チェックアウト後は高政で工場見学とかまぼこやき体験後、みなとまちセラミカ工房でスペインタイル絵付け体験を蹴飛ばして
明神丸でまかない丼。みなとまちセラミカ工房で記念になるものを頼んで女川湾周遊です。


食べ歩きブログ 今日もどこかで 
女川町復幸祭2016

食べ歩きブログ 今日もどこかで 
女川町復幸祭2016 

食べ歩きブログ 今日もどこかで 
女川町復幸祭2016 

たかやの食べ飲み歩きでは食べ歩き情報も。 フードニュース・オンライン 「食」の専門資格を取得したフードアナリストが参加するブログポータル








食べログ グルメブログランキング

にほんブログ村 グルメブログへにほんブログ村




          行くぜ東北 女川町復幸祭2016応援ツアー 華夕美 高政見学 明神丸まかない丼 女川湾周遊30   

おはようございます。管理栄養士の一之瀬隆哉です。

釜鶴ひもの店/熱海の老舗 こだわり干物を自社製造 販売 通販

Scott | 熱海 レストランスコット

熱海でおすすめの洋菓子店|三木製菓

女川観光旅行 女川歴史民俗紀行

映画「ケアニン~あなたでよかった~」公式サイト


大田区産業プラザ 2017大会(7月14日(金)第5回研究発表会・通常総会・15日(土)シンポジウム)

檑亭 千年屋 J:COMオンデマンド 視聴サイト デジブック ケアネット アマゾン じゃらん 

うなぎ亭 友栄 箱根湯寮  Yahoo Japan  熱海金城館 富士屋ホテル 湯本富士屋ホテル

宮城県女川町のホテル・エルファロ=女川トレーラーハウス宿泊村= 移転リニューアル準備中

【公式】東伊豆ダイニング 東伊豆今宵【最低価格保証】 厳選いい宿 - テレビで見た宿をお得に予約|テレビ東京 

KKRホテル熱海【公式サイト】 | 海を一望できる熱海のリゾートホテル

伊豆高原 旨い酒と料理の宿 森のしずく -神の雫ワインや美味しい料理が味わえるグルメ旅- プチホテル/ペンション

登録銘菓ホール・イン

伊東マリンタウン | 伊豆の「道の駅伊東マリンタウン」 ホーム | 丘の上の一軒家レストラン「澤亭」

ビデオカメラ GZ-E770 Web ユーザーガイド| JVCケンウッド SHOPPING PLAZA HAYAMA STATION(葉山ステーション)

レストラン「潮幸」 | 葉山ホテル音羽ノ森【公式】 YOKOHAMA MARINE TOWER | 横浜マリンタワー

『オペラ座の怪人』横浜公演スペシャルサイト|劇団四季 HAWAIʻI EXPO 2017

茅ヶ崎の日帰り天然温泉 竜泉寺の湯 湘南茅ヶ崎店|軟水の高濃度炭酸泉と最新の岩盤浴

栄養経営士テキスト 日清MCTオイル&パウダー エネプリン もっとエネルギー 社会福祉法人 同胞互助会

ヘルシーネットワーク 関西電力病院 社会医療法人近森会

茅ヶ崎の日帰り天然温泉 竜泉寺の湯 湘南茅ヶ崎店|軟水の高濃度炭酸泉と最新の岩盤浴

茅ヶ崎の自然食とEM商品、自然食ダイニングの「にじまる」 京城苑 日本災害食学会研究発表会

省力化と豊かさ実現! スチコンレシピ集&活用術 WA・ON (株)WA・ONは、あなたのくらしに“ちょっとプラス”を考える会社です。

食べ歩きブログ 今日もどこかで  冬のごほうび 防災士 女川町復幸祭2017

トーヨーフーズ株式会社|ドライパック缶(ひじき・大豆・コーン等) 

非常食のサバイバルフーズ。賞味期限25年の長期保存できる防災備蓄食料品 | 株式会社セイエンタプライズ

LLFの長期賞味期限食品(防災備蓄食・携行食・カロリーバランス食)|ロングライフフーズ

防災・非常食UAA食品®|アルファフーズ株式会社

高齢者の口腔と摂食嚥下の機能維持・向上のための取組に関する調査

横浜市の焼肉ビーフマン横浜関内店 UCワールドおみやげサービス アロハプログラム | ハワイ州観光局公認の公式ラーニングサイト

日本災害食学会

女川温泉 華夕美  味の館 金華楼 Beerbar ガル屋 焼肉 幸楽 理容ヨコヤマ 酒飯処 かぐら おんま~と 

ジャパネットたかた ネスレ 臨床栄養 WEBセミナー EL FARO - エルファロ - 被災地初のトレーラーハウス宿泊村 

明神丸 
みなとまちセラミカ工房
 シーパル観光案内所 女川温泉ゆぽっぽ 女川湾周遊・金華山航行潮プランニング 

ハワイ州観光局公式Facebook 地元市場ハマテラス シェラトン・ワイキキ / Sheraton Waikiki ハワイ州観光局 - Hawaii ハワイ – gohawaii.com 

明太子(めんたいこ)の通販・お取り寄せ|博多の味
 銘菓「蹴洞(けほぎ)」 onagawa factory(小さな復興プロジェクト)   たびレジ - 外務省海外旅行登録

クラフトビールの横濱金沢ブリュワリー・MR配達弁当のデリバリーLaFusion菜na
 えらべる倶楽部 よーじや 病態栄養学会 えきねっと(JR東日本)

栄養学に基づいた食事を提案する街の健康バランス食堂|「鹿屋アスリート食堂(アスショク)」
KKRホテル東京(国家公務員共済組合連合会 東京共済会館) メール 日本栄養士会 神奈川県栄養士会

もしもごはん 本気で取り組む災害食 個人備蓄のすすめと共助・公助のあり方 いしかわ百万石物語・江戸本店 石川県アンテナショップ
緊急時に備えた家庭用食料品備蓄ガイド
  おながわさんま収獲祭2016 日本酒通販Sake芯

みんなで減災 スフィア・プロジェクト 避難所運営ガイドライン 災害時のトイレの必要数計算シート
防災科学技術研究所  生きる力を育む防災教育の展開 物流センサス 受援力のススメ

全国栄養経営士のつどい ホテルビスタ仙台 博多 由布院・武雄温泉 万葉の湯 女川町復幸祭2017 東日本大震災メモリアル 南浜つなぐ館

博多 由布院・武雄温泉 万葉の湯 Kobe Japanese Steak House | Hawaii Honolulu Waikiki 肉ソン大統領(新横浜/鉄板焼き) 神戸ステーキハウス

産直鮮魚とマグロの明神丸

 産直鮮魚とマグロの明神丸 
ジャンル:宮城県女川町公認居酒屋 
アクセス:地下鉄門前仲町駅 2番出口 徒歩5分 住所:〒135-0047 東京都江東区富岡1‐24‐6 2F(地図
利用しています→ベストスタイル グルテストNeoアルファ パインファイバー
食べながら備えるローリングストックBOX ホリカフーズ 災害食・非常食
ブログ型ダイエット日記サイト『ダイエット☆マメグラフ』
Dining&BARU 藍の音
ジャンル:居酒屋 
アクセス:京急本線横須賀中央駅 徒歩4分 住所:〒238-0007 神奈川県横須賀市若松町3-4-1 202(地図

宮城まるごと探訪 - 宮城県の観光,イベント情報はこちら
 おらほのラジオ体操
女川町観光協会ホームページ

ぶらり♪お散歩カメラ|写真を「撮る」「見る」「伝える」。感動を共有するコミュニティサイト。


南三陸 2014南三陸温泉旅行 蒲鉾本舗 高政
[南三陸 de お買い物]ギフト 海鮮 海産物 珍味 スイーツの通販 取寄せ

南三陸 復興ストア - Yahoo!ショッピング
 鎌倉戦隊ボウサイダー
横浜南部市場の東北再生支援ショップ「愛と勇気とさんま」 水曜・日曜定休 営業時間 : 10時~18時 横浜市中区元浜町4-36 安協サービスセンター1F
東北ココロむすぶプロジェクトin鎌倉『東北物産展』
 3月12,,26日(土) 鎌倉生涯学習センターにて開催
南三陸復興ダコの会「オクトパス君」オフィシャルページ
 お取り扱い店
卒 煙 式 sotsuen.jpn.org
 卒煙式で、ただひたすらガマンする禁煙ではなく、本当の"卒煙"を達成してください。
復刻版 宮城県郷土かるた

多言語情報翻訳システム 地震災害
 NHK生活・防災
Cafe & Dinner PUKA
食べログ Cafe & Dinner PUKA フェイスブック
食べ歩きブログ 今日もどこかで 

おながわファンクラブ
 開いたお店の商品を買って応援
がんばる女川セット(水産加工品セット) 商品詰合せセット 2 種類 A セット:3,000円/箱 ・ B セット:5,000円/箱 (税込・送料別)
たかや(@takayaichi) - Twilog←最新の食べ歩きや地元の画像をつぶやいています
FBログ Ichinose Takaya←Facebook上で『全体に公開』でつぶやいた投稿 デジブック 『女川グッズ』


平成28年3月25日25日夕から女川町復幸祭2016応援ツアーに参加しました。
横浜からのバスツアー、翌朝は竜泉寺の湯 仙台泉店で入浴休憩。
石巻の海岸沿いを通り一年ぶりの女川駅に到着。
津波伝承「復幸男」見学後のさんまつみれ汁は冷めたからだにしみわたりました。
ビールとサンマ焼き、女川塩レモンハイボール飲んだ後、理容ヨコヤマで散髪。睡眠不足と酔いで散髪中はうたた寝。
散髪後、コーヒーでも飲んでいきなよとあたたかい一言。 メン棒で耳の仲もきれいにしてくれるんですね。
その後、昨年坂の上のお店の前まで行って入らなかった.味の館 金華楼へ。
26日夕食は幸楽で焼き肉、Sugar Shackでお酒、酒飯処 かぐらで目指しと刺し盛りを食べたあと華夕美で一泊。
チェックアウト後は高政で工場見学とかまぼこやき体験後、みなとまちセラミカ工房でスペインタイル絵付け体験を蹴飛ばして
明神丸でまかない丼。みなとまちセラミカ工房で記念になるものを頼んで女川湾周遊です。


食べ歩きブログ 今日もどこかで 
女川町復幸祭2016

食べ歩きブログ 今日もどこかで 
女川町復幸祭2016 

食べ歩きブログ 今日もどこかで 
女川町復幸祭2016 

たかやの食べ飲み歩きでは食べ歩き情報も。 フードニュース・オンライン 「食」の専門資格を取得したフードアナリストが参加するブログポータル








食べログ グルメブログランキング

にほんブログ村 グルメブログへにほんブログ村




          FORMULARIO DE LIQUIDACION   

FORMULARIO DE LIQUIDACION POR PRESTACIONES SOCIALES



https://www.dropbox.com/s/0gtg6p9wiaiy2y3/FORMULARIO%20DE%20LIQUIDACION.xlsx


DOCENTE
JUAN CARLOS CIFUENTES



ESTUDIANTE
YENIFER PEREZ MORELOS



FUNDACION ANTONIO DE AREVALO
SALUD OCUPACIONAL
III SEMESTRE



10/ABRIL/2012


          Facebook and organ donation: does getting people to sign up as organ donors actually make a difference?   
A year ago today, Facebook launched a PR blitz announcing that they were making it possible to publicize your organ donation status on Facebook. Donate Life America, the national coalition of state organ donation organizations, made it pretty clear that Facebook was launching a concerted PR effort:
In an exclusive interview with ABC News’ Robin Roberts on “Good Morning America” this morning, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg announced the new initiative and became one of the first Facebook users to sign up to donate on the social network. Tonight Facebook’s COO and one of America’s most powerful businesswomen Sheryl Sandberg will sit down exclusively with Diane Sawyer. ABC News affiliates, ABC News Radio, Yahoo! and ABCNews.com will also feature coverage of the exciting new initiative. ESPN will be running two powerful organ donation stories throughout the day on SportsCenter that encourage organ and tissue donation.
Aaron Swartz, Kieran Healy and I had a short discussion about the prospects for an effect on Twitter. I was optimistic, but Healy said, "public support for donation hasn't been the bottleneck for a very long time."

The best data I've found on the impact of Facebook's efforts comes from a CBC news article from June 25th:
The Facebook drive had an immediate effect. In the first few days, more than 100,000 people changed their status to indicate they were willing to be donors.

To be official, a willing organ donor needs to sign up with their own government's donor program, so Facebook also provided direct links to local donor registries. Donate Life America (DLA), a non-profit dedicated to raising donor awareness, subsequently reported an average 1,000-per-cent increase in online donor registrations across the U.S. over the six days following the addition of the donor feature.

To put that in concrete terms, during that time period 33,406 people legally registered to be donors; other years the number of signups was much smaller – in 2011 for the same time period, it was 3,288. Since then, the signup numbers have stabilized at around 1,150 per day, which was still more than double the historical daily average of 548.
So the Facebook effort led some people who probably weren't on the list before to sign up as organ donors - if the pace kept up, which seems unlikely, Facebook would have led to around 200,000 additional people joining the list this year. But does getting people who aren't yet donors to sign up make much of a difference?

This may seem like a crazy question, so some context is useful: if you die in a way such that your organs could be donated, even if you're not a registered donor, the "organ procurement organization" (OPO) will still ask your family if they'd like your organs to be donated. The OPOs are good (and getting better) at asking, and most people do support organ donation, so they actually get permission from most families that are asked when their loved one wasn't a registered donor. Conversely, in most cases, even if you're registered as a donor, if your family says they don't want your organs donated, the OPO will follow their wishes (this happens pretty rarely, luckily). So, structurally, it's actually not all that obvious that getting more people to sign up as organ donors will make much of a difference, especially if the people you get to sign up are the ones whose families already support donation (which seems pretty likely).

The ideal way to address this problem would be to run a large randomized control trial: spend a bunch of money on randomly giving specific people messages about registering as donors, hopefully getting a big difference in registration rates between treatment and control groups, and then follow them for years to see if the treatment group actually ends up donating at higher rates. This would be expensive, time consuming, and difficult, and to my knowledge it's never been tried.

There are two easier strategies we can pursue to try to identify the impact of marginal donor registry sign-ups, though they won't have the same rigor as the RCT:

  1. compare the actual donation rates of people who are eligible to donate upon death who are and aren't registered donors
  2. comparing states based on the proportion of registered people and the proportion of eligible donors who actually donate. The data and code for my analysis are on github here and figshare here. Feel free to email me if you need any help interpreting; I didn't do much to document well.

Neither of these strategies is as good as an RCT, and in particular both will be unable to distinguish whether registration efforts are just leading more people who would donate anyway to sign up on the list, but they still provide useful information.



1. How much more often do eligible deaths turn into donations for registered than un-registered donors?

We need a few data points, some assumptions, and easy algebra to answer this question:

  • Overall, the consent rate for eligible deaths nationally in 2011 was 75.4% (big XLS; linked to from here). This figure includes both registered and unregistered donors. (I use 2011 data because it's the most recent available for the figures below and consistency seems more important than recency.)
  • Amongst all deceased donors in the U.S. in 2011, 36.2% had registered as donors prior to their deaths. (PDF)
  • There is conflicting data on how often families of registered donors consent for their loved ones' organs to be taken, but 96% seems to be a reasonable, if optimistic, forward-looking estimate:
    • The most recent data comes from a 2013 study by Heather Traino and Laura Simonoff, covering 1,090 families who were asked to donate on behalf of their loved ones, found that 97.6% of families of registered donors actually consented to donation. However, they also found that 85.6% of families of non-registered eligible donors consented to donation, much higher than the national average of 75.4%. This is particularly worrisome because they had some nonresponse bias, with families that consented to donation being more likely to participate, and the same problem may have arisen with families of registered donors, leading to an underestimate of the proportion of families of registered donors who refuse donation. If we assume the ratios of non-donation scale the same way from the sample toa  national group across registered and non-registered donors, we'd estimate that 24.6%/14.4% * 2.4% = 4.1% of registered donor families would refuse donation. Despite the nonresponse bias and the need to extrapolate, this study is the one I regard are most credible, as it is the largest and most recent. The estimated impact of the registry could be made more conservative by assuming that scaling to a nationally representative group occurs in the same proportion as the rate of consent -- 75.4%/85.6% * 97.6% = 86% -- but this strikes me as too conservative.
    • An older study from Ohio and Pennsylvania from 1994-1999 (Siminoff et al. 2001) finds that 89.3% of families that knew the deceased has a donor card consented to donation, but only 44% of families who knew the deceased didn't have a donor card consented, implying 10.7% of families of registered donors refuse donation. In the period since this study, all the states have passed laws allowing OPOs to obtain organs of registered donors even if families object, even if they don't do so in practice, and it seems likely that the rate of consent amongst registered donors would have risen as a result; 90% strikes me as a reasonable lower bound assumption.
    • A smaller study from North Carolina found that 20% of families of registered donors refused donation, but I think it's an outlier.
  • The key other assumptions that we need to get the calculation off the ground is that "eligible" donors are representative of all donors.
And then the basic equation is:
36.2%*95.9% + (1-36.2%)*x = 75.4%

Solving for x, we get:
x = (75.4%-36.2%*95.9%)/(1-36.2%) = 64% of non-registered donors consent to donating
If instead of assuming that 95.9% of registered donors consent when given the option, we assumed that 90% do, we'd estimate that 67% of non-registered donors consent to donating.

The national conversion rate for eligible donors (i.e. the rate at which they actually end up donating) in 2011 was 73.1% (big XLS; linked to from here), or 97% of the 75.4% consent rate. Applying that discount, we would estimate that:

  • Under the 95.9% assumption, registration is associated with a 31 percentage point increase in conversion: (95.9%-64%)*97%
  • Under the 90% assumption, registration is associated with a 22 percentage point increase in conversion: (90%-67%)*97%.

Since there were 8,993 eligible deaths reported in 2011, and an additional 1,554 "non-eligible" donations actually occurred (big XLSX; linked to from here). If we assume that the additional deceased donors consented at the same rate as eligible donors (couldn't find data on this), the 1,554 additional donors would come out of a pool of 2,061 potential additional donors (there were probably many more and conversion rates are lower, but I think it makes sense to focus on this), for a but actually occurring deceased donors, for a pool of 11,054 potential deceased donors. 2.51 million people died in the U.S. in 2011 (CDC PDF), so the rough chance of ever dying in a way that makes you donation-eligible is 0.44%. And since 311.8 million people lived in the U.S. in 2011, the chance of dying in a way that makes you donation eligible in 2011 was 0.0035%.

Multiplying these out, we'd expect adding 1 random person to the organ donation registry to increase the number of deceased donors in that year by 0.0011% (0.0035%*31%) and in their lifetime by 0.14% (0.44%*31%). So adding a million donors to the registry is expected to increase donation by 11 donors that year and 1400 donors per lifetime. Using the 90% instead of 95.9% assumption above would cut both of these estimates by about one third.

I've only been able to find one other attempt at this kind of analysis in the literature, and it wasn't very rigorous, but the value it comes out with is within an order of magnitude of mine: Tyler Harrison estimates that 1% of people die in a way such that their organs can be harvested, and that 95% of those who sign donor cards actually donate, while only 50% of those who don't sign their donor cards end up donating, for a net lifetime increase in donation due to registration of 0.45%, about three times my estimate. He claims, "Regardless, if we go by earlier assumptions on rates of consent and eligible donors, adding 200 names to a registry should result in one new donor over a lifetime."

Looking back on the Facebook data, my methodology for this part would suggest that, aggressively assuming that Facebook led to 200,000 new registered donors, that would have led to ~2 more actual donors in the past year, and would lead to ~280 over the course of a lifetime. Assuming that the benefits dropped off more quickly (which would be verifiable if Facebook or DonateLife America released the data) might cut the estimated effect in half or more.

All of this still assumes that the people Facebook got to sign up wouldn't have signed up, or, when the time came, donated, otherwise. In both cases, I find that assumption pretty dubious, and my arbitrary guess would be that as a result the estimates above are probably several times more optimistic than they should be, though it could easily be as much as a couple of magnitudes too optimistic; it's hard to see how they could be much too pessimistic.

2. Comparing states by the proportion of registered donors and eligible donor conversion rates

If registering donors makes a difference, we would expect that states that have a higher proportion of people registered as organ donors would also have a higher proportion of eligible deceased donors who actually ended up donating. I've looked, and I see surprisingly little evidence to support that hypothesis.

First, it's worth noting that, nationally, the number of registered organ donors has almost doubled since 2006. In 2006, there were an estimated 57 million registered donors in the U.S. (PDF), while at the end of 2012 data pointed to more than 109 million registered donors in the U.S. Over the same period, we haven't seen any massive increase in the total number of deceased donors, which continues to hover around 2,000 per quarter (8,000 per year):
(There is less variability on the left hand side of the graph because the 2006, 2007, and 2008 figures are imputed from annual data.)

This chart is inconclusive because it could still be possible that the increase in registered organ donors did a lot to prevent a secular decline in total donations, but this chart doesn't look very good for the case that registering donors makes a big difference to donation rates.

Applying the roughly 50 million increase in the number of registered donors above to the optimistic figures calculated in the previous section, we would predict another ~550 deceased donors per year, or an extra ~140 deceased donors per quarter. There is enough natural variability in the annual donation figures that we might not be able to detect such a change graphically, but there doesn't appear to be much evidence of that kind of systematic increase in the chart.

To control for the possibility that there might be a secular decline in the number of people who die in ways that would make them eligible to donate, we should look at the proportion of eligible potential donors who actually end up donating, rather than the absolute number of donors:

There's a subtle but detectable increase in the "conversion rate" (i.e. the proportion of eligible donors who end up donating) over the period we look at, leaving open the possibility that increases in the number of registered donors may be making a difference. Re-scaling the chart would make the growth in the conversion rate more obvious.

The data underlying these charts is actually available at the state level, so it's possible to make some more informed inferences (and some prettier charts).

For instance, we can look at the state-specific trend in the proportion of the population that are registered as organ donors (never above 60% because the denominator includes, e.g., children, who don't register):
There's a general upward trend over time across almost all of the states, but there's considerably more noise than is apparent in the national data, and a fair amount of missing data (e.g. in Puerto Rico).

Looking at a similar chart for the conversion rate (i.e. the proportion of eligible donors who end up donating), we see considerably more variation, which makes sense because of the smaller sample sizes:
Comparing the conversion rate to the proportion of eligible donors by state, there are many states that look like they fit the hypothesis decently well (e.g. Alaska, Colorado, Hawaii) and others that look like counterexamples (e.g. Alabama, Maine, Montana):

The obvious thing to do in this case is a regression (or a series of regressions). Cutting to the chase, we can reject effect sizes of the magnitude predicted by the algebra above (e.g. 11 additional deceased donors per year per million additional registered donors). To my knowledge, this analysis has never been done before in the literature.

Brief regression results:

Model 1 is a simple OLS regression of the quarterly number of deceased donors on the number of eligible deaths, population, and number of registered donors in each state. However, the standard errors aren't appropriate because they don't reflect the clustering of observations in by state and time: this regression basically assumes that I was able to observe the data in 966 random places. Model 1 finds that for every million additional donors, we get 5 (=4*1.3) additional deceased donors per year, and the result is highly statistically significant.

Model 2 more appropriately controls for the fact that we actually only have observations from 52 "states" (DC and Puerto Rico are included), and that there could be correlated shocks across states by time. In this model, we're unable to reject the possibility than the number of registered donors by state is uncorrelated with the number of deceased donors. To be statistically significant, adding an additional million donors to the registry would have to be correlated with about ~4 more deceased donors per year, and we don't observe that correlation. I consider this the most credible model of the three.

I'm not sure what to make of the switch in the sign of the coefficient on state populations between Models 1 and 2, but I find it a little worrisome. In addition, dropping population from Model 2 results in a positive and statistically significant coefficient on the number of designated donors for reasons I don't really understand. (I mean, I know it's because population and the number of designated donors are correlated, but I'm not really sure why the population continues to be correlated with the number of deceased donors after eligible deaths and quarter and state fixed effects are included; it seems likely that it's because states that have faster-growing populations are also experiencing higher conversion rates, which I wouldn't necessarily expect.)

Model 3 also includes state and quarter fixed effects, and just regressed conversion rate on the portion of the state population registered as donors, not finding anything statistically significant.

I wasn't all that thorough in exploring the solution space of possible regressions on this data, and I'm not highly confident in the regression results, so both for the sake of replicability and to allow others to continue the analysis if they see fit, my poorly-documented R script is up on github here and the data it uses are on figshare here.

I didn't spend much time documenting the code or data, so drop me an email if you need help interpreting.

Conclusion

I've worked through two approaches to trying to estimate the impact of adding people to the list of registered donors. Though they differ quite a bit in assumptions and conclusions, both support the conclusion that the impact of adding a million people to the organ donor registry is likely less than 10 additional deceased organ donors per year, and probably quite a bit smaller than that. This would imply that Facebook's efforts to lead people to sign up as organ donors over the past year have led to <2 additional organ donors this year.

My vague impression is that the organ donation community spends a huge amount of its time, money, and effort trying to get more people to sign up as organ donors. My analysis here has been tentative and exploratory, but I think the lack of stronger empirical evidence for an actual impact of those registries is startling, and that it would be worth a fuller exploration by people with more subject-matter expertise than I have. Given that there are a lot of other strategies for improving organ donation, continuing to focus on donor registration outreach seems like it may be leaving a lot on the table.
          US, State Population Update for 2016   
On December 19, 2016 the US Census Bureau released its US national and state population estimates for July 1, 2016.  On December 26, 2016 usgovernmentspending.com updated its US and state population data as follows:
  • We updated 2010-2016 population data for US and states using data from US Census Bureau Population Estimates: vintage 2016 in file nst-est2016-01.xlsx.
  • We projected 2017 thru 2021 for US and the states assuming population rate change for 2015-16.
  • We updated 2017 thru 2021 for US only using data from US Census Bureau 2014 National Population Projections in file NP2014-T1.xls.
usgovernmentspending.com uses population data in computing per capita spending and revenue data. You can see per capita spending data in a chart here, and in a table of spending here.

You can check the data update schedule here.

          Federal Deficit and Outlay Actuals for FY16   
On October 14, 2016, the US Treasury reported in its Monthly Treasury Statement (and xls) for September that the federal deficit for FY 2016 ending September 30 was $587 billion. Here are the numbers, including total receipts, total outlays, and deficit compared with the numbers projected in the FY 2017 federal budget published in February 2016:

Federal Finances
FY 2016 Outcomes
Budget
billions
Outcome
billions
Receipts $3,336$3,267
Outlays$3,951$3,854
Deficit$616$587

usfederalbudget.us now shows the new numbers for total FY 2016 outlays and receipts on its Estimate vs. Actual page.

The Monthly Treasury Statement includes ""Table 4: Receipts of the United States Government, September 2015 and Other Periods." This table of receipts by source is used for usgovernmentspending.com to post federal receipt actuals for FY 2016.

The Monthly Treasury Statement includes "Table 9. Summary of Receipts by Source, and Outlays by Function of the U.S. Government, September 2016 and Other Periods".   This table of outlays by function makes it possible for usgovernmentspending.com to estimate actual outlays by "subfunction" for FY 2016 by factoring budgeted amounts by the difference between budgeted and actual "function" amounts where actual outlays by subfunction cannot be gleaned from the Monthly Treasury Statement.

Final detailed FY 2016 numbers will not appear on usgovernmentspending.com until the FY 2018 federal budget is published in February 2017 with the actual outlays for FY 2016 in Historical Table 3.2--Outlays by Function and Subfunction.

          US, State Population Update for 2015   
On December 22, 2015 the US Census Bureau released its national and state population estimates for July 1, 2015.  On December 22, 2015 usgovernmentspending.com updated its US and state population data as follows:
  • We updated 2010-2015 population data for US and states using data from US Census Bureau Population Estimates: vintage 2015 in file NST-EST2015-01.xlsx.
  • We projected 2016 thru 2020 for US and states assuming population rate change for 2014-15.
  • We updated 2016 thru 2020 for US using data from US Census Bureau 2014 National Population Projections in file NP2014-T1.xls.
usgovernmentspending.com uses population data in computing per capita spending and revenue data. You can see per capita spending data in a chart here, and in a table of spending here.

You can check the data update schedule here.

          PROGRAMA DEL IV ENEAA   
Cabros, aun queda tiempo para inscribirse, vayan al servipag o algo, no dejen de venir. Les dejo links para descargar las Mesas magistrales (invitados y resumenes), y para que vean los abstract de las mesas de ponencias. Ademas el material que ya se ha entregado anteriormente sobre los horarios.
MESAS MAGISTRALES
http://jgm.uchile.googlepages.com/MESAS_MAGISTRALES.doc

RESUMENES PONENCIAS
http://jgm.uchile.googlepages.com/ABSTRACTS_PONENCIAS.doc

HORARIOS MESAS Y PONENCIAS
http://jgm.uchile.googlepages.com/HORARIO_MESAS_Y_PONENCIAS.doc

CRONOGRAMA MESAS ESTUDIANTILES
http://jgm.uchile.googlepages.com/Mesasestudiantiles.xls
          OpenXml and openxmllib – looking for volunteers   
Abstract openxmllib is a pure Python package built on lxml that parses an ECMA373 office file (read *.docx, *.pptx, *.xlsx ...
Continue reading
          Harmonogram egzaminu magisterskiego - Filozofia (03.07.2017)   

Harmonogram do pobrania:


          Αποτελέσματα βαθμολογίας Πανελληνίων 2017 -Mόρια σχολών -Βάσεις - -results.it.minedu.gov.gr-ΕΠΑΛ --Προβλέψεις   

Ανακοίνωση βαθμολογίας Πανελλαδικών Εξετάσεων ΓΕΛ και ΕΠΑΛ 2017
Από το Υπουργείο Παιδείας, Έρευνας και Θρησκευμάτων ανακοινώνεται ότι οι βαθμολογίες των Πανελλαδικών Εξετάσεων ΓΕΛ και ΕΠΑΛ προγραμματίζεται να ανακοινωθούν την Παρασκευή 30-6-2017, περί τις 11:00 π.μ. σε όλα τα ΓΕΛ και ΕΠΑΛ της χώρας.
Ταυτόχρονα, όλοι οι υποψήφιοι θα μπορούν να βρίσκουν τη βαθμολογία τους στην ιστοσελίδα  http://results.it.minedu.gov.grπληκτρολογώντας τον 8-ψήφιο κωδικό τους και τους 4 αρχικούς χαρακτήρες από το επώνυμο, το όνομα, το πατρώνυμο και το μητρώνυμο του υποψηφίου σε κεφαλαίους ελληνικούς χαρακτήρες.
Από την Πέμπτη 6-7-2017 και μετά, όλοι οι υποψήφιοι στην ηλεκτρονική διεύθυνση http://exams.it.minedu.gov.gr θα μπορούν να οριστικοποιήσουν το μηχανογραφικό τους δελτίο (επιλέγοντας ΟΡΙΣΤΙΚΟΠΟΙΗΣΗ) ως και την Παρασκευή 14-7-2017. Η προθεσμία είναι αποκλειστική και μετά την παρέλευσή της κανένας υποψήφιος δεν θα μπορεί να οριστικοποιήσει το μηχανογραφικό δελτίο.
Επισημαίνεται ότι για τους υποψηφίους των ΓΕΛ και ΕΠΑΛ των Διευθύνσεων Λέσβου και Χίου που συμμετέχουν στις υπολειπόμενες εξετάσεις, δεν θα ανακοινωθούν οι βαθμοί την Παρασκευή, αλλά το συντομότερο δυνατόν.
Τέλος, τη Δευτέρα 3-7-2017 προγραμματίζεται να ανακοινωθούν στατιστικά στοιχεία για τις φετινές βαθμολογικές επιδόσεις ΓΕΛ και ΕΠΑΛ.






Τα στοιχεία μέχρι σήμερα, δείχνουν ότι υπάρχουν σημαντικές αλλαγές σε όλα τα επιστημονικά πεδία καθώς τα φετινά θέματα των πανελλαδικών έφεραν τα πάνω-κάτω.

Σε ό,τι αφορά στο πρώτο επιστημονικό πεδίο οι προβλέψεις λένε ότι αναμένεται μια ελαφριά κάμψη, καθώς η γενικότερη εικόνα είναι πως οι υποψήφιοι είχαν ελαφρά χειρότερες επιδόσεις σε σχέση με την προηγούμενη χρονιά. Για παράδειγμα αναφέρεται πως και οι τρεις Νομικές σχολές θα κινηθούν προς τα κάτω, ωστόσο η πτώση των βάσεων δεν θα είναι σημαντική.
Αντίθετα στο 2ο επιστημονικό πεδίο τα μαθηματικά αλλάζουν τα δεδομένα. Τα θέματα στέρησαν ακόμη και από άριστους μαθητές μια καλή επίδοση και έτσι αναμένεται σημαντική πτώση στις Πολυτεχνικές Σχολές, αλλά και στις φυσικομαθηματικές. Χαρακτηριστικά αναφέρεται πως όσο πιο υψηλή είναι η βάση τόσο μεγαλύτερη θα είναι και η πτώση της...
Σε ό,τι αφορά στο 3ο επιστημονικό πεδίο τη διαφορά για εφέτος κάνει το μάθημα της βιολογίας, το οποίο όπως και τα μαθηματικά δυσκόλεψε τους υποψηφίους. Και εδώ οι επιδόσεις δεν ήταν καλές και έτσι αναμένεται πτώση των βάσεων, ίσως όχι όση αυτή των Πολυτεχνικών Σχολών, ωστόσο θα είναι σημαντική. Μάλιστα αναφέρεται χαρακτηριστικά ότι φέτος η Ιατρική της Αθήνας μπορεί να πέσει (έστω και οριακά) κάτω από τα 19.000 μόρια.
Στο 4ο πεδίο τη διαφορά δεν κάνει κάποιο μάθημα, αλλά ο αριθμός των υποψηφίων που σε ό,τι αφορά στα Παιδαγωγικά έχει διπλασιαστεί και οδηγεί τις βάσεις αυτών των σχολών προς τα επάνω λόγω του αυξημένου ανταγωνισμού.
Στο 5ο και στα δυο θέματα με αυξημένη βαρύτητα τα θέματα ήταν δύσκολα και οι επιδόσεις κινήθηκαν σε χαμηλά επίπεδα για την πλειοψηφία των υποψηφίων. Κάπως έτσι η πρόβλεψη για τις βάσεις των Οικονομικών Σχολών λέει ότι αναμένεται σημαντική πτώση.
 
Δείτε τις ΕΔΩ τις πρώτες εκτιμήσεις για τις βάσεις εισαγωγής 2017 σε ΑΕΙ, ΤΕΙ από την Ημερησία.

Δείτε ΕΔΩ Το Μηχανογραφικό-Υπολογισμός μορίων

ΔΕΙΤΕ ΤΑ ΠΑΝΤΑ ΓΙΑ ΤΙΣ ΠΑΝΕΛΛΗΝΙΕΣ 2017


ΔΕΙΤΕ ΤΙΣ ΒΑΣΕΙΣ ΤΩΝ ΠΡΟΗΓΟΥΜΕΝΩΝ ΕΤΩΝ ΠΑΤΩΝΤΑΣ ΕΔΩ και ΕΔΩ και ΕΔΩ
Πώς υπολογίζονται τα μόρια 


Υπολογισμός Μορίων από τις Γραπτές Βαθμολογίες των Πανελλαδικών Εξετάσεων   πατήστε ΕΔΩ


Δείτε ΤΑ ΠΑΝΤΑ ΓΙΑ ΤΙΣ ΠΑΝΕΛΛΗΝΙΕΣ 



*****************************************

Αποτελέσματα πανελληνίων 2015

Βάσεις επιλογή 90%ΓΕΛ, ΕΠΑΛ Β, ΗΜΕΡΗΣΙΑ ΠΑΝΕΛΛΑΔΙΚΕς 2015

Βάσεις επιλογή 90% ΓΕΛ, ΕΠΑΛ Β, ΕΣΠΕΡΙΝΑ Πανελλαδικές 2015

Βάσεις επιλογή 10% 2014 ΓΕΛ, ΕΠΑΛ Β,2014, Πανελλαδικές 2015

Βάσεις επιλογή 10% 2013 ΓΕΛ, ΕΠΑΛ Β, 2013, Πανελλαδικές 2015

Βάσεις επιλογή ΕΠΑΛ Α ΗΜΕΡΗΣΙΑ Πανελλαδικές 2015

Βάσεις επιλογή ΕΠΑΛ ΕΣΠΕΡΙΝΑ Πανελλαδικές 2015

Βάσεις επιλογή 10% ΕΠΑΛ Α 2014 Πανελλαδικές 2015

Βάσεις επιλογή 10% ΕΠΑΛ Α 2013 Πανελλαδικές 2015

Βάσεις επιλογή αλλογενών αλλογενείς (ΕΕ) Πανελλαδικές 2015

Βάσεις επιλογή αλλογενών αλλογενείς (εκτός ΕΕ) Πανελλαδικές 2015
****************************************

          Новая глобальная атака шифровальщика: подробности от «Доктор Веб»   

28 июня 2017 года

Специалисты компании "Доктор Веб" изучают новый троянец-шифровальщик Trojan.Encoder.12544, упоминаемый в СМИ как Petya, Petya.A, ExPetya и WannaCry-2. На основании предварительного анализа вредоносной программы компания "Доктор Веб" представляет рекомендации, как избежать заражения, рассказывает, что делать, если заражение уже произошло, и раскрывает технические подробности атаки.

Наделавший много шума червь-шифровальщик Trojan.Encoder.12544 представляет серьезную опасность для персональных компьютеров, работающих под управлением Microsoft Windows. Различные источники называют его модификацией троянца, известного под именем Petya (Trojan.Ransom.369), но Trojan.Encoder.12544 имеет с ним лишь некоторое сходство. Эта вредоносная программа проникла в информационные системы целого ряда госструктур, банков и коммерческих организаций, а также заразила ПК пользователей в нескольких странах.

На текущий момент известно, что троянец заражает компьютеры при помощи того же набора уязвимостей, которые ранее использовались злоумышленниками для внедрения на компьютеры жертв троянца WannaCry. Массовое распространение Trojan.Encoder.12544 началось в первой половине дня 27.06.2017. При запуске на атакуемом компьютере троянец несколькими способами ищет доступные в локальной сети ПК, после чего по списку полученных IP-адресов начинает сканировать порты 445 и 139. Обнаружив в сети машины, на которых открыты эти порты, Trojan.Encoder.12544 пытается инфицировать их с использованием широко известной уязвимости в протоколе SMB (MS17-10).

В своем теле троянец содержит 4 сжатых ресурса, 2 из которых являются 32- и 64-разрядной версиями утилиты Mimikatz, предназначенной для перехвата паролей открытых сессий в Windows. В зависимости от разрядности ОС он распаковывает соответствующую версию утилиты, сохраняет ее во временную папку, после чего запускает. При помощи утилиты Mimikatz, а также двумя другими способами Trojan.Encoder.12544 получает список локальных и доменных пользователей, авторизованных на зараженном компьютере. Затем он ищет доступные на запись сетевые папки, пытается открыть их с использованием полученных учетных данных и сохранить там свою копию. Чтобы инфицировать компьютеры, к которым ему удалось получить доступ, Trojan.Encoder.12544 использует утилиту для управления удаленным компьютером PsExec (она также хранится в ресурсах троянца) или стандартную консольную утилиту для вызова объектов Wmic.exe.

Контроль своего повторного запуска энкодер осуществляет с помощью файла, сохраняемого им в папке C:\Windows\. Этот файл имеет имя, соответствующее имени троянца без расширения. Поскольку распространяемый злоумышленниками в настоящий момент образец червя имеет имя perfc.dat, то файл, предотвращающий его повторный запуск, будет иметь имя C:\Windows\perfc. Однако стоит злоумышленникам изменить исходное имя троянца, и создание в папке C:\Windows\ файла с именем perfc без расширения (как советуют некоторые антивирусные компании), уже не спасет компьютер от заражения. Кроме того, троянец осуществляет проверку наличия файла, только если у него достаточно для этого привилегий в операционной системе.

После старта троянец настраивает для себя привилегии, загружает собственную копию в память и передает ей управление. Затем энкодер перезаписывает собственный файл на диске мусорными данными и удаляет его. В первую очередь Trojan.Encoder.12544 портит VBR (Volume Boot Record, загрузочная запись раздела) диска C:, первый сектор диска заполняется мусорными данными. Затем шифровальщик копирует оригинальную загрузочную запись Windows в другой участок диска, предварительно зашифровав ее с использованием алгоритма XOR, а вместо нее записывает свою. Далее он создает задание на перезагрузку компьютера, и начинает шифровать все обнаруженные на локальных физических дисках файлы с расширениями .3ds, .7z, .accdb, .ai, .asp, .aspx, .avhd, .back, .bak, .c, .cfg, .conf, .cpp, .cs, .ctl, .dbf, .disk, .djvu, .doc, .docx, .dwg, .eml, .fdb, .gz, .h, .hdd, .kdbx, .mail, .mdb, .msg, .nrg, .ora, .ost, .ova, .ovf, .pdf, .php, .pmf, .ppt, .pptx, .pst, .pvi, .py, .pyc, .rar, .rtf, .sln, .sql, .tar, .vbox, .vbs, .vcb, .vdi, .vfd, .vmc, .vmdk, .vmsd, .vmx, .vsdx, .vsv, .work, .xls, .xlsx, .xvd, .zip.

Троянец шифрует файлы только на фиксированных дисках компьютера, данные на каждом диске шифруются в отдельном потоке. Шифрование осуществляется с использованием алгоритмов AES-128-CBC, для каждого диска создается собственный ключ (это — отличительная особенность троянца, не отмеченная другими исследователями). Этот ключ шифруется с использованием алгоритма RSA-2048 (другие исследователи сообщали, что используется 800-битный ключ) и сохраняется в корневую папку зашифрованного диска в файл с именем README.TXT. Зашифрованные файлы не получают дополнительного расширения.

После выполнения созданного ранее задания компьютер перезагружается, и управление передается троянской загрузочной записи. Она демонстрирует на экране зараженного компьютера текст, напоминающий сообщение стандартной утилиты для проверки дисков CHDISK.

screenshot Trojan.Encoder.12544 #drweb

В это время Trojan.Encoder.12544 шифрует MFT (Master File Table). Завершив шифрование, Trojan.Encoder.12544 демонстрирует на экране требование злоумышленников об уплате выкупа.

screenshot Trojan.Encoder.12544 #drweb

Если в момент запуска на экране появилось сообщение о запуске утилиты CHDISK, незамедлительно выключите питание ПК. Загрузочная запись в этом случае будет повреждена, но ее можно исправить при помощи утилиты восстановления Windows или Консоли восстановления, загрузившись с дистрибутивного диска. Восстановление загрузочной записи обычно возможно в ОС Windows версии 7 и более поздних, если на диске имеется используемый системой скрытый раздел с резервной копией критичных для работы Windows данных. В Windows XP такой способ восстановления загрузки не сработает. Также для этого можно использовать Dr.Web LiveDisk — создайте загрузочный диск или флешку, выполните загрузку с этого съемного устройства, запустите сканер Dr.Web, выполните проверку пострадавшего диска, выберите функцию «Обезвредить» для найденных угроз.

По сообщениям из различных источников единственный используемый распространителями Trojan.Encoder.12544 ящик электронной почты в настоящее время заблокирован, поэтому они в принципе не могут связаться со своими жертвами (чтобы, например, предложить расшифровку файлов).

С целью профилактики заражения троянцем Trojan.Encoder.12544 компания «Доктор Веб» рекомендует своевременно создавать резервные копии всех критичных данных на независимых носителях, а также использовать функцию «Защита от потери данных» Dr.Web Security Space. Кроме того, необходимо устанавливать все обновления безопасности операционной системы. Специалисты компании «Доктор Веб» продолжают исследование шифровальщика Trojan.Encoder.12544.

Инструкция пострадавшим от Trojan.Encoder.12544